MomShots

I had a great comment on my last post from my talented and beautiful sister. 

I have some advice. For those who are in this to learn as well….what’s a DSLR? I have never heard that before and don’t know what it means. I get the general idea of what your saying in that blog but the terms are on your lvl of learning and I am not…
my 2 cents. 

She makes a really good point.  I have been obsessively focusing on learning about photography that I forget the rest of the world isn’t as obsessed with this stuff. I am throwing out terms that don’t mean a whole lot to the average camera user.  This is a term that I explained a WAY long time ago in an earlier post but I need to remember to keep explaining it every time I post about it.  I need to remember that.  Thanks so much for the reminder!  I really do appreciate it.

So here is my answer to your question (warning - Way more than you really wanted to know…  that’s what you get when you ask an obsessed person!):

SLR stands for Single Lens Reflex. The D stands for Digital - DSLR. Single Lens Reflex mean that when you look through the view finder you are seeing exactly what your lens is seeing. You might wonder how this can be because the view finder is above the lens. There are a series of mirrors that bounce the lenses image up to the view finder.

On a point and shoot camera there are no mirrors to bounce the image up to your view finder. What you see through your view finder and on your LCD screen will be slightly different than what your lens actually sees.  The viewfinder sees an image that is slightly above and to the left of your lens.  This doesn’t really make that much of a difference when you are taking photos of things that are far away but when you are shooting something close up, you have to compensate for that slightly, if it matters to you.  

An other main difference is the absolute manual control you have over the settings you are using to take a photo.  You can choose to make you photo brighter, darker, capture the action by using a fast shutter speed or blur the action by using a slow shutter speed.  You have the ultimate control over your image and that can be kind of scary and intimidating (at least it was to me - hence the SLRaphpbia).  You can also change your lenses.  This is a huge plus because there are so many lens options to choose from between a macro (super up close) to a telephoto zoom (super far away but you can zoom in and get the image anyway).  

One last benefit of the DSLR that I would like to make, is that they are usually made with a faster processor than digital point and shoot cameras.  I don’t know why this is, perhaps it is just the demand from the professional industry.  But “usually” digital point and shoot cameras have a slower processor and that means when you push the button there is a little bit of a lag from when the photo is actually taken.  My D100 is pretty old and I know that Kristina’s new 30D is way faster than mine.  As technology advances so do the cameras - both digital point and shoot and DSLR.

A point and shoot has many good features.  The ease of use is a great benefit.  It is relatively easy to use; you just point and shoot.  There are so many great preset program modes that benefit the user as well.  There are modes that will help you take photos of people in groups, single people, fireworks, up close (macro), far away (zoom), landscapes, etc.  I know that the new Sony Cybershot has an interesting mode that focuses on people’s smiles.  

Another great point about the point and shoots are that they are usually compact.  Slip them in your pocket or purse and pull them out quickly to capture the action.  

Also, more recent digital point and shoots have a faster processor than their predecessors but they are not using the same processors that they use in the DSLRs.  My sister’s new Sony Cybershot probably has a faster processor than my D100 because mine is such an old camera.  But I would venture to say that it probably isn’t as fast as Kristina’s 30D or even a newer DSLR.  This makes it possible for a DSLR user to do that old click-click-click-click-click that we associate with film cameras.  You can’t really do that with a digital point and shoot.  

(Please, if you contest what I am saying, post a comment.  As I have previously said, my most recent point and shoot is a few years old.  I have not tried more recent cameras.  As budget allows, I would like to try and review some more current digital point and shoots.  Also, if you would like to post a review of a camera, email me.  I would love to hear your thoughts!!!  Momshots at yahoo dot com.)

Anyway… as neat as all these preset modes are, I am drawn to the manual control of the SLR camera.  I found that I rarely used any of the preset modes in my point and shoot.  I posted earlier about my favorite mode - the Sports mode.  That’s about all I consistently used.  Sure, I tried the other modes here and there but I ended up using the same mode over and over.  

I hope that clears up what the difference between DSLR and Point and Shoot is.  I am also not saying that the SLR is better than the point and shoot.  They are different cameras.  I am saying that I personally am really enjoying learning how to use my SLR.  I am enjoying it far more than I ever did my point and shoot cameras.

If you ever want to find some really cool photos by point and shoot users, do a search in Flickr for a specific camera model.  For instance, I just did two Flickr searches one for Sony Cybershot and the other for Nikon Coolpix.  Both searches yielded tons of really artistic and beautiful images.  You can do so many great things with a digital point and shoot.  I think the key is to develop your artistic eye and explore the capabilities of your camera.  That goes for both DSLR and point and shoot!

I found an explanation on the Kodak website about the difference between SLR and point and shoot.  If you want more info, check it out here.

So lately I have been thinking (don’t I seem to start all of my posts with this phrase???)…  I have been thinking about the benefits of a SLR versus the benefits of a point and shoot.  All my life I have been afraid of SLR cameras.  This is a true statement.  Is there a name for that kind of fear?  SLRaphobic?

When I was in my late teens/early 20’s I had a film SLR.  I used it while I traveled through Europe.  Once my backpack was “broken into” and they stole my favorite black sweater but they left the SLR.  Secretly, I was a little sad about that.

I came home from my trip and seriously had about 1 picture that looked halfway in focus.  It was a huge photographic bust.  I longed for my black sweater.

At that time in my life, a point and shoot was exactly the kind of camera I needed.  I needed something that I could just “point” and “shoot”.  I didn’t want to have to think about how my camera worked.  I didn’t even really care what the images looked like.  In reality, I don’t think I really ever developed more than two rolls of film because I just didn’t care.  I enjoyed the act of photographing much more than the finished result.

Part of me is sad about this because the first 4 or so years of my married life are pretty much unphotographically (not a word, I know.) documented.  Then I was introduced to the relatively new technology of a digital camera - still a point and shoot.  But awesome.  An HP Photosmart early edition.  It rocked in all its dinosaurish technological glory.  Finally, I was able to see my photos when I uploaded them to my computer.  I still wasn’t doing anything with them but at least I could see what the photos I took looked like!

After the HP Photosmart came a Nikon Coolpix, edition number unknown, however I think it was 3400 or something like that.  After that came my current Nikon Coolpix 5600.  The thing that I loved about these Nikons was that they had all these cool program modes.  My HP didn’t.  It was too early in history for that.

I never fully took advantage of my program modes but I sure had fun taking lots of pictures.  I loved that there were program mode possibilities.  It made me feel like I could be a good photographer if I just worked on it a little.  I guess I didn’t really ever work on it very much…

My step into the digital SLR (DSLR) world didn’t actually happen until early this year.  Like I said, I was SLRaphobic.  I mention in a previous post about my 2007 Halloween frustration because I didn’t have access to my point and shoot and the Nikon D100 was too scary.  I tried to use the D100 but my photos were too dark and I didn’t have any idea how to make them lighter.

My next experience with that DSLR was at Christmas time.  I dressed my three boys up as three little kings and tried to take a photo to use on a Christmas card.  I overcame my fear and produced an image that was OK for my complete lack of knowledge.  I slowly have been learning more and more about how to use that camera.

I still have my point and shoot - Nikon Coolpix 5600, but officially I call it Uly’s Camera.  The last time I tried to use it I realized it really is broken and isn’t worth the frustration.  It’s way more fun to watch my 4 year old take pictures with it.  I love seeing his results.  He’s an artistic little fellow!

So I guess the point that I want to make in this meandering post is that I am really enjoying using a DSLR.  I am officially unafraid!  Do I get a medal or anything?  I enjoy it way more than I ever did, my point and shoots.  I love the control that I have over the exposure and focus.  I guess truly am a control freak!  I just love being able to tell my camera what I want and have it create that.  I’m not beholden to a preset mode, if I don’t want to be.

Now before you died in the wool point and shoot users turn your back on me, I want to say that I have seen some amazing images that came from a point and shoot.  Also, the newer cameras have some pretty cool technology.  I am just really enjoying this DSLR adventure.  I am having so much more fun using this camera than I ever did with any of our previous cameras.  I am also getting many more results that I like.